Consideration of comorbidity in treatment decision making in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings: a systematic review.

نویسندگان

  • J Stairmand
  • L Signal
  • D Sarfati
  • C Jackson
  • L Batten
  • M Holdaway
  • C Cunningham
چکیده

BACKGROUND Comorbidity is very common among patients with cancer. Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs) are increasingly the context within which cancer treatment decisions are made internationally. Little is known about how comorbidity is considered, or impacts decisions, in MDTs. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate previous evidence on consideration, and impact, of comorbidity in cancer MDT treatment decision making. Twenty-one original studies were included. RESULTS Lack of information on comorbidity in MDTs impedes the ability of MDT members to make treatment recommendations, and for those recommendations to be implemented among patients with comorbidity. Where treatment is different from that recommended due to comorbidity, it is more conservative, despite evidence that such treatment may be tolerated and effective. MDT members are likely to be unaware of the extent to which issues such as comorbidity are ignored. CONCLUSIONS MDTs should systematically consider treatment of patients with comorbidity. Further research is needed to assist clinicians to undertake MDT decision making that appropriately addresses comorbidity. If this were to occur, it would likely contribute to improved outcomes for cancer patients with comorbidities.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

In Absentia: An Exploratory Study of How Patients Are Considered in Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings

BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary team meetings and shared decision-making are potential means of delivering patient-centred care. Not much is known about how those two paradigms fit together in cancer care. This study aimed to investigate how decisions are made in multidisciplinary team meetings and whether patient perspectives are incorporated in these decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS A qualitat...

متن کامل

The role of multidisciplinary team meetings in optimal management of complex dermatology: a novel concept?

We would like to draw the attention of thedermatological fraternity to the concept ofmultidisciplinary team meetings. This concept,although novel in dermatology, has been in voguefor optimal oncological management in variouspremier cancer set-ups worldwide. MultidisciplinaryTeam Meetings (MDTs) or tumour boards are agroup of dedicated personnel aimed at optimisingthe management of cancer patien...

متن کامل

The anatomy of clinical decision-making in multidisciplinary cancer meetings

In the UK, treatment recommendations for patients with cancer are routinely made by multidisciplinary teams in weekly meetings. However, their performance is variable.The aim of this study was to explore the underlying structure of multidisciplinary decision-making process, and examine how it relates to team ability to reach a decision.This is a cross-sectional observational study consisting of...

متن کامل

Clinical audit of multidisciplinary care at a medium-sized hospital in Spain

BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary care is a key enabler in the provision of high quality care for cancer patients. Despite compelling evidence supporting their benefit to patients and for providers, multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCC) are not universally occurring. Team composition of MCC reflects the multidisciplinary nature of the body. Lack of nursing input can have a negative impact on te...

متن کامل

Quality assessment of decision-making in colorectal cancer multidisciplinary meetings.

PURPOSE The quality of decision-making in the colorectal multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings can significantly affect the quality of care delivered to patients with colorectal cancer. We performed a prospective study to assess the quality of the MDT meetings in a specialized colorectal unit using an externally observational validated tool. METHODS An externally validated observational tool,...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology

دوره 26 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015